On another note, perhaps we should use a different term instead of "opposing", it seems a bit ambiguous to me. Also thanks for placing the Burgundians in alphabetical order, something I overlooked, I was surprised they weren't already mentioned. I removed the secondary colours, as you say they're not as important as the primary colours. So what do you think: should we compromise and use just the colours on the base ring of a faction's units? - Perey 21:12, (UTC) (That was largely because I wasn't certain I could remember the secondary colours reliably.) Now they've all been given secondary colours, even those where the unit bases use only one (like the English - I'm not sure you can accurately call yellow their secondary colour, even if it's on the banner). When I wrote out the single-colour version, I went for the colour used to draw a faction's borders and shade their region on the minimap. I'm not certain about some of the colour descriptions. (That's according to the manual, anyway it's never happened to me!) - Perey 21:08, (UTC) Perey 22:43, (UTC)Ĭhanged back the word 'rebellious' to 'opposing', as the player can side with either the current ruler or the rebels in a civil war, and hence it's the faction opposing the player that's the minor faction(s). ![]() "Grand strategy" has been removed from Strategy game ( Talk) and the changes to the header levels are apparently pointless. ![]() 11 Fair use rationale for Image:MedievalTotalWarItalianCampaign.jpg. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |